Cadmium : « L’absence de preuve “irréfutable” ne devrait jamais servir d’alibi à l’inaction »

The debate surrounding cadmium exposure is polarized due to misunderstandings about the status of scientific evidence in public health, according to Carl Gaigné and Mathieu Parenti, specialists in agricultural and environmental issues, in an opinion piece for 'Le Monde'. They argue that the lack of 'irrefutable' proof should not serve as an excuse for inaction.